Researchers Seek Ways to Minimize Off-Target Effects
Literature Review: Dials for Cas9
Methods to Control Cas9-Based Technologies Across Numerous Dimensions Is Still Lacking
Opening Up Relieves Downstream Bottlenecks
Celebrate the Downstream Improvements That Have Been Achieved, Even If They Fail to Match Upstream Improvements
Top 10 European Biopharma Clusters
The Continent’s Key Academic and Industrial Centers for Drug Development
Raising the Bar for Human Clinical Trials
Standards for authorizing first-time trials of drugs in humans are lax, and should be strengthened in several ways, McGill University researchers argue in a paper published in Nature. While regulators in North America and Europe evaluate safety before human trials can proceed, they do not currently demand meaningful evidence for potential efficacy, say the investigators.
Trials of ineffective therapies place burdens on society even if research participants aren't harmed directly, the researchers argue. Drug development soaks up financial and research resources; patients and healthy volunteers involved in testing a dud treatment miss out on more promising ones; and expenses wasted on ineffective therapies are often passed on to healthcare systems in the form of higher drug prices. The argument for better scrutiny of animal studies may be especially timely, since the incoming U.S. president has indicated he intends to weaken requirements for clinical evidence of efficacy before drugs are approved.